Do not put Lake Elsinore in debt for improvements to the La Laguna campground!

The city should not take on a $20 million debt for borrowing $10 million for improvements to the La Laguna campground (or any sum for that matter).The city has no business running a campground (or a restaurant, hotel, supermarket etc.). If no private investors are interested to pay for improvements to the La Laguna campground, that means it's a bad idea? The city says the La Laguna improvements will pay for itself and will bring businesses. The Diamond Stadium was also going to pay for itself and was also going to bring businesses. 23 years later, the city is still $12 million in debt for the stdium and is still paying $500,000 out of the city fund to patch the financial hole of the Diamond Stadium. No businesses. Did the council members learn anything? I am documenting the lake (boats), the boat launch and campground occupancy. There is no way the La Laguna campground will pay for itself.  The worst case scenario according to the staff report is 40% YEARLY AVERAGE occupancy. The occupancy of the La Laguna boat launch and the campground were UNDER 40% occupancy during the busiest weekend of the year, the weekend of 2, 3 and 4 July. The city will pay back $640,000 each year out of the city fund over 31 years (totalling $19,840,000). The city cannot guarantee the lake will not dry up and/or there will not be a new recession in the next 31 years. It is a certainty that the income of La Laguna will not cover the yearly payments for the loan. The city will have no choice but to cut in police and fire services and city maintenance. Lower security and bad maintenance will further lower home values. No residents will use the campground. Putting $14 million in a campground in a run down area infested by meth shooting homeless drug addicts is putting lipstick on a pig. You might as well flush the money down the toilet. Why is it that the council members are willing to follow you (Grant Yates) in a high risk venture that has FAIL written all over it, putting the importance (priority) of improvements to the La Laguna campground ABOVE the security of the residents and ABOVE their home values?


More on this + images documenting the campground occupancy:


Oppose this and sign the petition:

Showing 5 reactions

How would you tag this suggestion?
Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2016-10-12 01:33:41 -0700
    I agree, the City should not take on this debt to finance the campground. We have more important issues that need to be addressed.
  • tagged this with Strongly disagree 2016-10-03 06:40:54 -0700
  • commented 2016-07-26 18:24:04 -0700
    This area is problematic. The land next to La Laguna is occupied by homeless drug addicts, the encampment is growing by the day. The city broke it down once but didn’t follow up so most people just moved their spot and it was business as usual down there. The area itself is a high crime area that doesn’t feel safe. Back to the safety thing. If you want visitors to come, they need to be safe and feel safe. That aside, the city has no business in private enterprise as stated above. The city has much bigger problems in this area to fix first. It’s like putting a nice resort in the middle of the ghetto. No, clean up the ghetto and then look for PRIVATE investors. Don’t strap the tax payer with a bad idea. City Manager and City Council will be long gone and the tax payer will be left holding the bag as will future City Management and Council.
  • tagged this with Strongly support 2016-07-26 18:24:03 -0700
  • published this page in Questions for the Speaker 2016-07-26 18:07:27 -0700